MYANMAR, Aug 30: The outgoing UN human rights chief says Myanmar's de-facto leader Aung San Suu Kyi should have resigned over the military's violent campaign against the Rohingya Muslim minority last year.
Zeid Ra'ad al Hussein told the BBC the Nobel Peace prize winner should have considered returning to house arrest rather than excusing the military.
A new UN report says Myanmar's military should be investigated for genocide.
Myanmar has rejected the report as one-sided.
The army of the Buddhist-majority nation - which has been accused of systematic ethnic cleansing - has previously cleared itself of wrongdoing.
The UN report, published on Monday, blamed Ms Suu Kyi, a long-term leader of the pro-democracy movement, for failing to prevent the violence.
Will we ever see Myanmar's military leaders in the dock?
What is genocide and why is the term so rarely used?
Seeing through the official story in Myanmar
"She was in a position to do something," Mr Hussein said in an interview with the BBC's Imogen Foulkes. "She could have stayed quiet - or even better, she could have resigned."
Suu Kyi visits Myanmar region torn by Rohingya conflict
"There was no need for her to be the spokesperson of the Burmese military. She didn't have to say this was an iceberg of misinformation. These were fabrications," he said.
"She could have said look, you know, I am prepared to be the nominal leader of the country but not under these conditions.
"Thank you very much, I will resign, I will go back into house arrest - I cannot be an adjunct accessory that others may think I am when it comes to these violations."
Between 1989 and 2010, Ms Suu Kyi, 73, spent about 16 years under house arrest by the military government.
On Wednesday, the Nobel committee said Ms Suu Kyi could not be stripped of the Peace Prize she was awarded in 1991.
What has Aung Sun Suu Kyi said?
While it is acknowledged that Ms Suu Kyi does not control the military, she has faced international pressure to condemn the army's alleged brutality.
For decades, she was hailed as the heroine of the human rights community - most notably for enduring house arrest for her pro-democracy activism during a brutal military dictatorship.
When communal violence broke out in 2012 and displaced more than 100,000 Rohingya people, Ms Suu Kyi sought to reassure the international community and pledged to "abide by our commitment to human rights and democratic values".
Aung San Suu Kyi: Then and now
What you need to know about the Rohingya crisis
How Suu Kyi sees the Rohingya crisis
"Muslims have been targeted but Buddhists have also been subjected to violence," she told the BBC at the time. "This fear is what is leading all the trouble."
She said that it was down to the government to bring an end to the violence, explaining: "This is the result of our suffering under a dictatorial regime."
In 2015, her National League for Democracy party won a landslide election victory and she became Myanmar's de-facto leader.
As the Rohingya crisis continued, Ms Suu Kyi's comments on the situation tended to play it down or suggest that people were exaggerating the severity of the violence.
The last time she spoke to the BBC in April 2017, she said: "I don't think there is ethnic cleansing going on. I think ethnic cleansing is too strong an expression to use for what is happening."
Profile: Aung San Suu Kyi
Could Aung San Suu Kyi face Rohingya genocide charges?
The Rohingya crisis: Why won't Aung San Suu Kyi act?
Since an outbreak of violence started in August 2017, Ms Suu Kyi has missed several opportunities to speak publicly about the issue, including the UN General Assembly in New York last September.
She later claimed the crisis was being distorted by a "huge iceberg of misinformation" - but then also said she felt "deeply" for the suffering of "all people" in the conflict.
Myanmar, she said, was "committed to a sustainable solution... for all communities in this state."
In 2015, her National League for Democracy party won a landslide election victory and she became Myanmar's de-facto leader.
As the Rohingya crisis continued, Ms Suu Kyi's comments on the situation tended to play it down or suggest that people were exaggerating the severity of the violence.
The last time she spoke to the BBC in April 2017, she said: "I don't think there is ethnic cleansing going on. I think ethnic cleansing is too strong an expression to use for what is happening."
Profile: Aung San Suu Kyi
Could Aung San Suu Kyi face Rohingya genocide charges?
The Rohingya crisis: Why won't Aung San Suu Kyi act?
Since an outbreak of violence started in August 2017, Ms Suu Kyi has missed several opportunities to speak publicly about the issue, including the UN General Assembly in New York last September.
She later claimed the crisis was being distorted by a "huge iceberg of misinformation" - but then also said she felt "deeply" for the suffering of "all people" in the conflict.
Myanmar, she said, was "committed to a sustainable solution... for all communities in this state."
Zeid Ra'ad al Hussein is known for his bluntness and his comments on Aung San Suu Kyi were no exception.
He bitterly criticised her attempts to excuse Myanmar's military. This week, UN investigators published evidence linking senior commanders to act of genocide.
His harsh words are another indication that Aung San Suu Kyi may now go down in history not as a Nobel Peace prize winner and pro-democracy leader, but as a woman who failed to act in the face of unspeakable human rights violations.
